Thursday, June 27, 2013

Teachers and Terror Part 3

Teachers and Terror Part 3

by Meg Curtis, PhD

Fast forward that initial experience with German to the next year, when I studied Italian. Then, once again, I was lost without my GPS unit, which hadn't even been invented yet. Once again, my Italian professor outdid my linguistic knowledge, which is exactly the way it is supposed to be for students. He smiled because he knew his class was terrified to open their mouths and expose their ignorance.

This time around, my experience was more devastating to my ego, if such a calamity is possible—and it is. Now, with five years of Latin to my credit, I kept speaking Italian with a Latin accent, as if I were singing in a church choir, instead of ordering an elegant meal in Rome, where he took Italian majors, to test their mastery of the spoken language. The Italian majors smiled; I wanted to cry.

Of course, with a year of German under my achievement belt, my ego thought it was prepared to be decimated, as I struggled to announce my name, and utter, "Ciao!"--as if six years of foreign language study rendered me a veteran of the language wars. Instead, German had entered my subconscious with its reverse word order. I thought in Latin, reversed in German, and stuttered in Italian!

Somehow, the music of Italian entranced me, nevertheless. I began to take pride in developing the accent of Roman Italian. If I couldn't say much, I could say it right nonetheless! I began to dream of visiting the Sistine Chapel, of understanding what Michelangelo meant when he said: "Those who love do not sleep." I researched his art, and discovered that he wrote poetry, too!

By the end of that second year of modern foreign language study, I had not gotten German out of my head, but I had developed enough courage to risk saying, "Buongiorno!" I had even begun to imagine that my mind could indeed master more than one or even two code systems. What I had not even begun to guess was that I had laid the foundation for research across literature from Dante back to Beowulf.

I could even sit in an Italian opera without keeping my eyes glued to the translation screens. I could enter into the drama of the music, and experience the glory of Italian tenors, as if they were singing right to me! When I saw Placido Domingo in person years later at the Metropolitan Opera, I wanted to race right up to him and declare: "Buona sera!" Where had my terror gone?


My terror was gone with my assumption that the human mind is shackled to one language like a woolly mammoth frozen in ice. My mind had begun to dance! If my feet could cha-cha, rumba, and mambo, so my brain could follow any routine that a language system laid out. It was true, as one English professor said: "Newborns can speak all the languages in the world!" And there I was with every dictionary before me.

Teachers and Terror Part 2

Teachers and Terror Part 2

by Meg Curtis, PhD

No one in that German class was more confused than I was. After five years of Latin, I thought in Latin. I translated English into Latin and Latin into English with a confidence born of daily assignments and weekly memorization of passages from Virgil, starting with 12 lines and working up to 24 lines. I was a linguistic ace; I knew my Latin backwards and forwards, but I didn't know German worth spit.

When the semester started, I was so lost that I couldn't have found my ego with a GPS unit or the help of the NSA. I whined my way from my dormitory to that German class, and started talking to myself. Finally, I heard myself whining, and it actually sounded funny. There I was at a first-rate college, and all I could do was complain. Suddenly it dawned on me: Every language is a new code system.

Every language required me to realize that I was a beginner, no matter how smart or accomplished I was. Once my brain accepted that fact, I got down to business. Out came my 3" by 5" cards, every single one decorated with a word on the front, and a definition on the back. Those cards went with me wherever I went: to the dining hall, the shower, even into phone booths. German became my constant companion.

After a single year of German, I knew that I wasn't an ace yet, but I had absorbed the most important lesson I would ever learn as a student: The pursuit of knowledge turns all of us into beginners. The pursuit of truth is even more challenging. My German professor displayed rare wit when she evaluated my German essay: "You grasp literature, but your grammar is metaphysical," she said with a smile.


Truer words were never spoken. I had tortured and twisted German grammar to convey the meanings in a work of German literature which I could discern but barely explain. That professor not only read my German essay; she even read my mind. She knew I was a poet. She even probably knew that I would write this tribute to the German lioness who revealed to me the German base of the English language. 

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Teachers and Terror Part 1

Teachers and Terror Part 1

by Meg Curtis, PhD

My favorite German professor was a terror. She came at a class like a martial artist. We trembled in her classroom because we knew it was her dojun—her gymnasium, her kingdom. She always located our points of ignorance and struck intellectually like a hammer hand splitting a block of concrete.

We knew we were dumb as sticks, and that recognition was simply honest. This professor had left us bereft of her wisdom for six weeks while she buried her father in the Father Land. Until she returned, her replacements suffered by comparison. They were "nice." They were "pleasant." They were weak. We stayed dumb.

When she returned, she had six more weeks to whip us into shape. She began by forbidding us to speak any language except German in her hearing. We stumbled over our "der's" and "du's," but obeyed her orders because second semester followed first, and we could not proceed to writing without grammar.

She sounds ruthless and cruel, but her method worked. As she stalked back and forth before the class, we waited for her to initiate conversation with each one of us. One by one, we received her individual attention in the form of a question in German requiring an answer in German. If we failed to reply, she ridiculed us in German.


Can you see us sitting there, decreasing our self-esteem, and ramming our learning pedal to the floor? Can you see us passing our grammar tests after just six weeks? Can you see us writing a 500 word essay—all in German—the next semester? Then you can see what we learned: We feared being ignorant, for it really, really hurt.

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Edward Snowden and English Classes for the DOS

Edward Snowden and English Classes for the DOS

by Meg Curtis, PhD

American rhetoric needs an upgrade in the Edward Snowden dilemma. The US continues to argue that foreign countries should return this man to his home country, like some runaway Huckleberry Finn. Too often, the American media refers to him as a high school drop-out, even though the best sources insist that Snowden completed his GED, took college courses, and studied foreign languages.

Does no one realize that attempts to downgrade Snowden's qualifications reveal the most superficial understanding of the modern technical workforce? This impression is reinforced by recommendations to have employees watch each other in the future, and report abberant behavior to superiors. All such suggestions underscore this fact: technical workers know more about the US security system than POTUS.

Meanwhile, the US insists that Snowden damaged US security, even while expecting countries--which it also insists benefited from Snowden's release of intelligence data--to return their accused benefactor to his home base. Do we have this straight? His beneficiaries should act contrary to their own interests, as described by the US government, and punish him for—according to the US--benefiting them?

This argument would not receive a passing grade in any competent freshman English class. First, it is circular, which is a major rhetorical fallacy, a flaw in logical thinking. Second, it violates the most basic relationship between a speaker and his/her audience. Memo to the DOS: Do NOT ask a foreign country to violate its own interests without a reward or benefit. Do NOT ask Americans to ignore ignorance.


So, who is the audience of the US position on Edward Snowden? The most obvious answer appears to be the media—if it chooses to repeat claims without questions. If journalists do ask thoughtful questions, will they end up like James Rosen, the Fox News Washington Correspondent harassed by the DOJ? Mindless repetition would be the safe choice, wouldn't it? So, is the poor quality of journalism here the result of fear? 


For further reading:




Monday, June 24, 2013

Doctors, Hands, and English Dreams

Doctors, Hands, and English Dreams

by Meg Curtis, PhD

The finest neurologist I ever met didn't major in Biology as an undergraduate. Why? I wondered. "Because healing depends on communication," he explained. "I can't treat patients successfully unless I know where they hurt—and why. My skill as a physician depends on my communication skills exceeding theirs, whoever they are, and I don't get to pick and choose who walks into my office. It might be a clerk, an engineer, or a writer."

As a writer, I didn't expect this tribute to my field coming from a scientist, but he assured me that he'd never regretted his academic foundation. In fact, he'd just sent his child off to Northern Ireland to study English there, too. She'd gone to study literature, and found a man on every street corner with a rifle. That's where language study leads: to every corner of culture, and, by traveling through language, she knew what to expect.

Since I am a writer, this physician had his hands full with me. Doctors have misdiagnosed me as a patient so many times that I introduce myself pointedly: "Hello, Doctor, I'm Doctor Curtis. I do appendices, instead of appendixes. How are you?" While the physician diagnoses me, I'm diagnosing him, too. If s/he laughs at my joke, I know the condition of his sense of humor, as well as his vocabulary and his susceptibility to defensive states of mind.

This one knew just what to say: "Oh, you're a doctor of English! How lucky! Then, I don't have to explain my treatment plans at great length. You're accustomed to looking for clues, and grasping quickly how significant the smallest details can be." We chatted along comfortably as he tested my hands for carpal tunnel syndrome. He stuck pins in my skin, but I barely noticed because he successfully distracted me with areodite references to poetry and drama.

He proved a quick learner, and didn't argue when I raised a point because he knew automatically that I'd argue right back: that's my training. He was the perfect doctor for me, and had come highly recommended by a co-worker whose grandfather was a PhD, too. The result was we agreed: surgery was the last remedy. If physical therapy proved successful, I would be on the road to recovery within weeks. It did. He is the reason I have my hands back today with no scars from his treatment.


So, he proved the essential lesson that every physician must learn first: Do no harm. He also impressed me with the wisdom of his practice. He chose to talk first, and knife a patient later—and only when necessary. He didn't knife me in either the front or back. He escorted me out of his office, and onto the life I wouldn't have discovered without him. This is what can happen when science and art collaborate. Maybe he was A Midsummer-Night's Dream. 

Sunday, June 23, 2013

Lyrica Ad Captures US Nerve Pain

Lyrica Ad Captures US Nerve Pain

by Meg Curtis, PhD

An advertisement on TNT for Lyrica diabetic nerve pain medication proves how artful commercials can be. How did its creators time this masterpiece to coincide with the NERVE PAIN experienced by the US government? Edward Snowden had the nerve to report unlimited snooping by the NSA on both American friends and competitors for respect and power in the international arena. Immediately, the US experienced the pain described in the advertisement.

In this brief drama, a middle-aged woman announces her suffering with just the right pause before the critical phrase: "diabetic nerve pain." She is a familiar figure, who might be viewers' relative or neighbor. With her chubby cheeks and white sneakers, she implicity asks for our sympathy and reports the relief she experiences by taking Lyrica, as advised by her wonderful doctor. She pauses emphatically every time she speaks those lyrical words: "diabetic nerve pain."

Yes, the US government appears to have a problem adusting its sugar level, too. Does this suffering drive its leaders into a coma, where they claim they can't remember what they did or when they did it? Will their suffering be alleviated by dragging some Clinton or another out to claim: "What does it matter?" or "I feel your pain"? Dump all the sugar you want on the Edward Snowden catastrophe, and America still has one awful headache.

The worse part is that, simultaneously, viewers can't wait for the next dump of sugar into the media, claiming US intentions were only for the safety of their citizens when they intruded on every kingdom in the world—and US citizens find themselves experiencing new stress, for which Lyrica is the wrong medication. Will Obamacare provide the solution for this deeply internal conflict? Do its adminstrative categories include "Headache" and "Sugar, Sugar"?


That R and B classic might inspire exercise, like practice walking to the ballot box with too much on our minds. The happy woman in the advertisement describes the symptom we should watch for: "the buzzing of bees" in the feet. Unfortunately, she's not the only one to suffer initially from some disaster or other during the current siege of scandals in the US. Too many bees are still turning up dead. Song-and-dance routines didn't help them either, but exercise remains free and cheap. 

The Edward Snowden Affair: A PR Disaster

The Edward Snowden Affair: A PR Disaster

by Meg Curtis, PhD

Why does the US bother pursuing Edward Snowden? Do American officials really expect any country besides the UK to turn him over for providing proof of their nightmares? He's even causing paranoia in the states for verifying that it isn't enough for the IRS to grab all US citizens' medical data under Obamacare. Now, the NSA won't be satisfied unless it has access to all our communications, too.

Is it clear at last why the US Congress gets absolutely nothing done? Maybe they just can't wait to consult with security agents about our calling patterns? Were we calling democrats or republicans? Did we buy products from democrats or republicans? Did our children ever contact Tea Party members to complain about Mom and Dad's nonconformist ideas? Worse yet, did we ever invite Tea Party members over for Tea and Sympathy?

If you could catch Edward right now for raising these concerns to public attention, would you incarcerate him forever? Well, consider China's and Russia's dilemma. Are they likely to turn Edward in either for revealing that while Obama sat there with heads of state, expecting them to apologize for intruding upon US security, all along his administration had the drop on all of them? And maybe the UK would like to explain why it's so hot to catch the boy, too?

In the current environment of Snooping and Subterfuge, the only reason that comes to mind for the UK's enthusiasm for this game of Catch and Carry is that they must have more to lose than gain, too, from exposure. Do we wish that this embarrassment had never happened? From the point of view of respect for the US, sure. But what is left of respect when the only thing that American citizens can do without government intrusion is to confess: I swear, I had nothing to do with this.


If they make this confession on Facebook, of course it will be recorded, for future reference. If they make this confession in an email, will The Watchers feel obliged to report that somebody's showing unpatriotic leanings? How do we serve a government that's more concerned with our business than its own? And how does any country ally with the US when the US insists on knowing more about it than its own government does? It's hard being friends with anyone who doesn't trust YOU.